OK, before I start ...... I am not a critic. Nor I am writing a review here.
This is just to voice out my opinion on one of the most famous movie character of all time .... 007 Agent (aka James Bond).
Daniel Craig acting as the 007 Agent ..... to me, that's not a good combination. I do not know what other people may think, but for me, he's just not the person to take on this character. OK, I do admit that he has the 'body' (remember him in his swimming trunk in Casino Royale) .... however he does not have the "Bond" look (the James Bond look with the "attitude" and "handsomeness"). This guy seems to be very "kayu" to me. Just compare him to Pierce Brosnan, Roger Moore or Sean Connery. These people really does have the James Bond in them.
I nearly slept halfway thru watching "Quantum of Solace" last nite. I don't know whether because of my tiredness from work or just the movie is not interesting enough to keep my attention. I don't usually or should I put it, very rarely, fall asleep while watching movies (even though I am tired) - though I do remember I fell asleep while watching Da Vinci Code.
Those who have been watching 007 movies all this while, you might again anticipate for a full action pack edition. I am rather disappointed - this James Bond movie was rather mild. And I do remember 007 movies with the Bond cars and latest hi-tech gadgets, well forget about all these for this time around. Oh no, James Bond seemed to be a murderer too nowadays.
I saw this article written in the Star today "Quantum of Errors" written by Audrey Gillian (also made reference to moviemistakes.com) - looks to me that the producers of 007 better do a thorough research or homework. To quote a couple of the mistakes:
1. Factual error: The city of La Paz, Bolivia is shown as a humid and hot city when the truth is, its elevation is 3,640 m (11,942 ft) and the average temperature is 8°C.
2. When Bond walks into the hotel in Haiti, a notice can be seen on the inside of the door, giving instructions on what to do in case of fire in French and English. The French section is headed "EN CASE D'INCENDIE". The correct French phrase should be "EN CAS D'INCENDIE".
